Teacher Leadership Perceptions in Turkish Culture : A Qualitative Analysis

The purpose of this study is to reveal the perceptions of school administrators, teachers, students and parents on characteristics as well as attitudes and behaviours of teacher leaders. Phenomenological research design from qualitative rmethods was employed in this study. The participants were selected from school administrators, teachers, students and parents through maximum diversity sampling method. Data analyses relied on content analyses technique. The findings of the study showed that school administrators and teachers attribute some traits, such as being knowledgeable and leader to teacher leaders, whereas students attach more importance to being reliable, fair and egalitarian. Parents, on the other hand, consider teachers who are friendly and impressive as leaders. It was found in the study that teacher leaders enhance the student learning, become role models and advocate strong collaboration with colleagues. As a result, it can be said that teacher leaders are those having the potential to attract others to follow him / her.


Introduction
Teachers have been considered as employees of school administrators due to an autocratic management style for a long history.From this perspective, it can be argued that teachers, since regarded as employees, have been performing their professions in a silence way without interfering anything outside the classroom because they don't have the authority to question their seniors in school organizations.With a contemporary management philosophy, current school leaders, however, have been in effort to seek for supports of all stakeholders, especially teachers (Gabriel, 2005).Within this context, it can be said that school administrators cannot take the responsibility to take decisions or to make policy on their owns since different stakeholders who have authority, status and power on school administration have a voice in educational processes (Cranston & Kusanovich, 2016).Unlike conventional leadership theories, distributed leadership emphasizes collaboration and collective initiatives.Frost and Harris (2003) argues that anybody other than the individual at the top of an organization can display leadership behaviours within the organization as it is in the distributed leadership.Harris and Muijs (2005) also stress that leaders are those triggering the change in the organization and don't necessarily need to be positioned at the top of the organization.Instead, anybody in the organization may lead the organization to set off the journey.As a result, school principals who want to reveal strong leadership skills in the organization must consider the power in a different way rather than the traditional perspective and must be willing to share the stage with others (Murphy, 2005).
Scientific studies on school development and change have placed important responsibilities on teachers other than their current roles, such as initiating professional development and change in the classroom (Harris & Muijs, 2005).At this point, as cited by Lovett (2018), the notion of teacher leadership is the result of other leadership theories and is associated with distributive leadership, pedagogical leadership and learning leadership.
Teacher leadership has been a core element of leadership literature since the 1980s.Teacher leadership, also associated with teacher professionalism, is seen as one of the key components of school development and student achievement (Lovett, 2018).The concept of teacher leadership has become popular in recent years, but it is not considered as a new concept.As a matter of fact, every educator has his colleagues whom they consider to be their leaders, and whose opinions are considered by others, from time to time for consultation and guidance purposes (Danielson, 2006).At the center of initiatives related to teacher leadership lies in the active involvement of teachers in leadership processes (York-Barr and Duke, 2004).Teacher leaders are also influential in communication and interaction skills within the organization and in the formation of school cultures.An effective school culture is directly proportional to the qualities of its members and organizational factors (Merideth, 2000).The fundamental characteristic feature of teacher leader is that they are truly informal leaders.They don't take their leadership powers or skills from an official authority or a position in the organization.Instead, this kind of leadership is the result of colleagues, students, parents and other stakeholders' perceptions in the school organizations (Danielson, 2006).Lovett (2018) states that teacher leadership is not a phenomenon only displayed by teachers' own ideas.With respect to this, Harris and Muijs (2005, p.95) put forward some conditions for a teacher to be regarded as leader by others in the organization: (1) a supportive culture; (2) strong leadership (i.e.support from the headteacher, senior management team and governors); (3) commitment to action enquiry and reflection; (4) innovative forms of professional development; (5) coordinated improvement efforts; (6) high levels of teacher participation and involvement; (7) data richness; (8) collective creativity; (9) shared professional practice; and (10) recognition and reward.
Teacher leadership can be thought of as a situation in which attitudes and behaviors result from the mutual interaction between the members of the organization, rather than the traditional roles attributed to them in the school organizations, and can be displayed by anybody in the organization when needed (Lambert, 2003).Reeves (2008) notes that there will be no decline in the status or power of school principals when they back up teacher leadership in school organizations.Instead, in this way, additional responsibilities would be added to their agenda.Teacher leaders, constantly struggling for teaching something new, tend to take a variety of risks for their job satisfaction and student achievement.They are influential in shaping the school's mission to contribute to school improvement processes (Merideth, 2000).On the other hand, Zepeda, Mayers and Benson (2003) point out the purposes of teachers who want to make a difference in their organizations and intend to be effective on colleagues and students stimulate them to take the responsility of teacher leadership.Harris and Muijs (2005) suggest that the concept of teacher leader is not new.Instead, teachers show leadership behaviors for many years in tasks such as program developing, team memberships, departmental leadership or team leadership, but teachers in these roles serve as representatives of change rather than leaders triggering change.What is more, leadership is not merely regarded as a perception originating in the mind.Just as learning is not just a mental process, leadership requires volunteerism (Merideth, 2000).Analyses of the literature in educational leadership have found that a great many of published sources include different definitions regarding teacher leadership and scholars haven't come to an agreement who is a teacher leader because teacher leadership encompasses a vast majority of attitudes and behaviours in different cultures and organizations (Merideth, 2000).Within this perspective, Katzenmeyer and Moller (2001) describe teacher leaders as those displaying leadership behaviours in and out of the classroom and affecting others in terms of school improvement and student achievement, whereas Harris and Lambert (2003) adopt the belief in which teachers have the opportunity to show leadership skills in various levels within the organization.Upon closer reading of the studies conducted on teacher leadership, the researchers are typically directed to teacher leaders' traits and behaviours (Ado, 2016;Brosky, 2001;Bryant, 2017;Cherkowski & Schnellert, 2017;Clayton, 2014;Clayton, Kilbane & McCarthy, 2017;Cozensa, 2015;Cekuc, 2008;Fairman & Mackenzie, 2014;Frost & Durrant, 2003;Katzenmeyer & Moller, 2001;Kaya, 2016;Khan & Malik, 2013;Lambert, 2003;Lumpkin, Claxton, & Wilson, 2014;York-Barr & Duke, 2004), teacher leadership roles (Al Suwaidi & Schoepp, 2015;Evans, 1996;Fullan & Hargreaves, 1996;Ghamrawi, 2013;Katzenmeyer & Moller, 2001;Kelly, 2011;Little, 2003;Smylie & Denny, 1990), administrators' roles in teacher leadership (Accardi, 2016;Can, 2010;DeMatthews, 2014;Kolukcu, 2011;Savas, 2016, Smith, 2014), factors affecting teacher leadership (Aslan, 2011;Gonzales, 2001;Kilinc, Cemaloglu ve Savas, 2015;Silva, Gimbert & Nolan, 2000;Smylie & Denny, 1990), teacher leaders in school improvement and change (Ankrum, 2016;Fairman & Mackenzie, 2015;Frost, 2012;Hook, 2006;Muijs & Harris, 2003, 2006;Ozcetin, 2013;Wa Ho, 2010), teacher leaders' role in student achievement (Camp, 2011;Mosley, Broyles & Kaufman, 2014), growing teacher leaders (Bradley-Levine, 2011;Coughlan, 2005;Cranston & Kusanovich, 2015;Duval;2017;Hunzicker, 2012;Ross, Adams, Bondy, Dana, Dodman & Swain, 2011), teacher leaders and distributed leadership (Harris, 2003(Harris, , 2005)), teacher leadership and professional development (Lowery-Moore, Latimer & Villate, 2016), teacher leaders and organizational culture (Ozturk ve Sahin, 2017), teacher leaders and organizational structure (Rutherford, 2006), teacher leaders and action research (Smeetsa & Ponte, 2009).The work of Kilinc, Cemaloglu and Savas (2015) tells us that occupational professionalism and perceived stress are significant predictors of teacher leadership.York- Barr and Duke (2004) conducted a conceptual analysis of the importance of teacher leadership, how teacher leader is defined, behaviors and characteristics of teacher leaders, conditions affecting teacher leadership, how teacher leaders can be trained and the effects of teacher leadership.When we examine the studies about teacher leadership, it can be seen that the studies on the identity of teacher leaders are relatively much more than any other related themes about teacher leadership.This means that scholars are still in pursuit of the identity of teacher leader and what characteristics and behaviours a teacher leader has.When the related literature was examined, we didn't come across any study evaluating the perceptions of school administrators, teachers, students and parents, who are the main stakeholders of educational organizations of teacher leaders all together.This current study is expected to contribute to the existing literature in terms of revealing the characteristics of teacher leader from the perspective of Turkish school administrators, teachers, students and parents.It is also supposed to make contributions in terms of cultural perspective to a universal issue.That is, revealing who do Turks consider as teacher leader may lead stakeholders to encourage support teacher leaders or trigger silent potential teacher leaders in school organizations.What is more, this study is expected to add to teacher training programmes, revealing the traits of teacher leaders in terms of school members.As cited by Clayton (2014), there are still more seats in the leadership arena for those wishing to express their opinions on teacher leadership and leadership in general, as well.Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to reveal the perceptions of school administrators, teachers, students and parents on characteristics as well as attitudes and behaviours of teacher leaders.In line with this aim, an attempt was made to look for the answers for these sub-research questions: 1. How do Turkish school administrators, teachers, students and parents conceptualize the characteristics of teacher leaders?
2. What are their perceptions regarding the attitudes and behaviours of teacher leaders?

Research Design
This study is a qualitative one which aims to examine or determine a phenomenon as it is.In these kinds of studies, the situations are attempted to examine thoroughly and are tried to describe -what they are‖ (Tanrıogen, 2014).Phenomonology research design was employed in this study as a research design.Phenomonological studies help us to focus on the situations of which we are aware, but don't have detailed information about them (Yildirim ve Simsek, 2005).At this point, it is considered as a suitable research design for this study.

Study Group
The participants were determined through maximum variety sampling technique from the purposeful sampling methods.The aim of this method is to form a small sample and reflect the participants' views at maxium level (Yildirim & Simsek, 2005).Within this context, a total of 120 participants including 30 school administrators and 30 teachers from primary, secondary and high schools, 30 students from secondary and high schools as well as 30 parents whose students are in primary, secondary and high schools in Amasya province were selected as the participants of the study.The participants were included in the study voluntarily so that they could answer the research questions in a sincere way.Gender, age, educational level, school type were considered in order to provide the variety in terms of participants.Participants were included from primary, secondary and high schools.Primary school students weren't included in the study, due to they may not be able to express their ideas according to the research questions in detail.While determining the participants, managerial and occupational experience for school administrators, branch and occupational experience for teachers, professions for parents were considered so that maximum variety could be achieved.School administrators were selected as principal, vice principal and deputy.10 elementary, 18 subject matter and 2 vocational teachers were determined for teachers.When it comes to parents' professions, the distributions can be listed as: half of them housewives, soldier, tradesman, retired, worker, technician, officer, preacher.It can be said that maximum variety has been achieved in terms of all participant groups.

Data Collection Instrument
Interview technique was employed in order to reveal the perceptions of the participants regarding the research theme.In a study, if the data are self-evident, there are two ways to obtain such data: individual interviews and group interviews.
The data collected in this way are based on verbal communication or narrative.The fact that participants are active in the social world and they express their opinion on the topic makes these methods valuable, so the interview can be considered as the most effective and basic method of qualitative data collection method (Ritchie, Lewis, McNaughton & Ormston, 2014).Data were obtained by using a semi-structured interview form prepared by the researchers after checking the existing literature and composed of two parts.The first part of the interview form consists of demographic information of the participants, while the second part included the questions revealing the participants' perceptions about the research topic.According to Kvale (1996), the researcher can be considered as a traveller setting forth on a journey together with the participant, and in this context, the researcher interprets the narratives and makes sense of them through interview.The interview technique provides data on participants' past experiences, opinions, feelings and direct knowledge of the level of knowledge about the subject, and collects data on these experiences and perceptions of research participants (Patton, 2002).Interviewing is one of the most effective data collection methods in qualitative research, and during the interview, the researcher aims to investigate human experiences on a specific subject (Kvale, 2006).In qualitative studies, internal validity is a condition which is related to whether the researcher can obtain the expected data by means of current instrument or method (Yildirim ve Simsek, 2005).

Data Analysis
In qualitative studies, data are obtained observations, interviews or document analysis techniques and are exposed to some analyses.The raw data are made ready for the analysis in this way, and are displayed in categories, themes and codes (Miles and Huberman, 1994).When the researcher completes the data collection process, descriptive or content analysis is conducted and themes are formed via words and sentences (Spencer, Ritchie and O'Connor, 2003).A content analysis technique was used to analyze the data obtained in this paper.Content analysis is defined as a systematic, repeatable technique in which certain words of a text are summarized by smaller content categories with certain rules-based coding (Buyukozturk, Cakmak, Akgun, Karadeniz & Demirel, 2012).In this respect, the themes, categories and codes and participant perceptions formed in the context of the related literature are shown in tables.In the process of analyzing the obtained data in this current study, firstly, the interview records were deciphered and analyzed.Various subcategories were created by considering the common points in the answers given for each question.An independent educational science expert was also asked for to create conceptual categories.The resulting themes, categories and codes are calculated according to the form expressed by Miles and Huberman (1994).According to Miles and Huberman' formulate (1994); reliability = opinion union / opinion union + opinion separation formula, the agreement between the researcher and the expert must be over 90%.
In this qualitative research, credibility, transferability, dependability, confirmability terms were used instead of validity and reliability.For the credibility of the study, the researchers paid attention to being objective from the beginning of the research.As for transferability of the study, the necessary details have been provided in the study.To increase the dependability of the study, the agreement was provided in terms of codes and findings.In order to ensure the dependability of the interview form, it was given to two educational science experts.In line with their recommendations, the form was redesigned and was prepared for preliminary interviews.Preliminary interviews were conducted with two participants from each group to determine whether the questions were clear and understandable.Interviews were held at designated times in order to ensure that they were able to express their feelings clearly and comfortably in line with the appointments made by the participants.In order to ensure the credibility of the work, the data were collected only in the environment of one of the researchers and participants so that the participants were not adversely affected during the interview process.The collected data were summarized and approved by the participants.In order to ensure the confirmability of the study, the findings were checked for compatibility with the conceptual framework.As for the confirmability of the study, how the data was obtained have been explained in detail.In this context, it is determined that the result of the calculations is 92% and it is understood that the obtained themes, categories and codes are reliable.
Participants were coded as P1, P2, P3, ... while displaying participants' own sentences.As the participant opinions are given in different headings as school administrator, teacher, student and parent, the letter P coded in each category represents the participant in the relevant category.In other words, the P1 code given under the heading of the school administrator represents the school administrator and the P1 given under the title of the teacher represents the teacher.

School administrators' perceptions on the characteristics of teacher leaders
When the data were examined, some striking findings were obtained after the coding processes.At this precise point, the codes revaled according to the data obtained from school administrators are presented in Table 2.As shown in Table 2, school administrators mostly regard teacher leaders as knowledgeable (n = 16), guide (n = 15), devoted (n = 12), role model (n = 11) and motivator (n = 10).In addition, such codes as principled (n = 9), leader (n = 9), skillful (n = 8), practitioner (n = 7), confidential (n = 7), self-reliant (n = 7), unique (n = 7) and decisive (n = 6) were formed according to the perceptions of school administrators.Other codes formed can be listed as: consistent (n = 5), loveable (n = 4), responsible (n = 4), respected (n = 4), connective (n = 4), persuader (n = 3), productive (n = 3), influential (n = 3), polite (n = 3), developer (n = 2), free (n = 2), modest (n = 2), social (n = 2), innovative (n = 2).When the codes displayed in Table 2 are evaluated, it can be argued that teacher leaders have extraordinary characteristic features in the perceptions of school administrators.School administrators regard teacher leaders as those who can create the difference in ordinary environments with their professional identities.Additionally, they attach importance some cultural values, including devoted, loveable and persuader.In the perpections of the school administrators, teachers leaders are those who consider teaching as a life style along with a professional occupation.

Teachers' perceptions on the characteristics of teacher leaders
When the data were examined, some striking findings were obtained after the coding processes.At this precise point, the codes revaled according to the data obtained from teachers are presented in Table 3.As shown in Table 3, teachers mostly regard teacher leaders as leader (n = 19), knowledgeable (n = 17), role model (n = 16), innovative (n = 10) and confidential (n = 9).In addition, such codes as motivator (n = 8), democratic (n = 8), responsible (n = 7), active (n = 7), authority (n = 6), sharer (n = 6), different (n = 5), skillful (n = 4) and organized (n = 4) were formed according to the perceptions of teachers.Other codes formed can be listed as: risk taker (n = 2), egalitarian (n = 2), supervisor (n = 2), social (n = 2), consistent (n = 2) and productive (n = 2).When the codes displayed in Table 3 are evaluated, it can be argued that as it is in the case of school administrators, teacher leaders have extraordinary characteristic features in the perceptions of teachers.Additionally, it can be suggested that teacher leaders have some professional skills as well as personal traits in the perceptions of teachers.Given that teacher leaders contribute a lot to their colleagues, especially in terms of professional development and improving instructing, those codes presented in Table 3 reflect the importance of being a teacher leader.

Students' perceptions on the characteristics of teacher leaders
When the data were examined, some striking findings were obtained after the coding processes.At this precise point, the codes revaled according to the data obtained from students are presented in Table 4.As shown in Table 4, students mostly regard teacher leaders as confidential (n = 20), fair (n = 16), egalitarian (n = 15), valuing (n = 15), listener (n = 13), entertainer (n = 11), sincere (n = 8) respected (n = 7).In addition, such codes as interested (n = 5), authoritarian (n = 5), loveable (n = 4), tolerant (n = 4), understanding (n = 3), consistent (n = 3), social (n = 3), sharer (n = 3), unique (n = 2), innovative (n = 2) and modest (n = 2) were formed according to the perceptions of students.When the codes displayed in Table 4 are evaluated, it can be argued that students attach more importance to being personality rather than teaching skills.The most important characteristics given importance by students are being confidential, fair and egalitarian.At this point, it can be argued that students want to trust their teachers and then they mind professional skills as teachers.

Parents' perceptions on the characteristics of teacher leaders
When the data were examined, some striking findings were obtained after the coding processes.At this precise point, the codes revaled according to the data obtained from parents are presented in Table 4.  5, parents mostly regard teacher leaders as loveable (n = 16), influential (n = 14), fair (n = 9), egalitarian (n = 8), respected (n = 6), authoritarian (n = 6) and role model (n = 6).In addition, such codes as consistent (n = 5), sincere (n = 5), sharer (n = 5) and balanced (n = 5) were formed according to the perceptions of parents.Other codes formed can be listed as: innovative (n = 4), understanding (n = 4), transformative (n = 4), sympathetic (n = 4), social (n = 4), ethical (n = 3), tender (n = 3), foreseeing (n = 2), empathetic (n = 2), self-sacrificing (n = 2) and patient (n = 2).When the codes displayed in Table 6 are evaluated, it can be argued that parents regards teachers who are both tender and authoritarian as teacher leaders.It can also be noted that parents confirm some type of authority in the classroom, especially authority from teachers.This situation can be attributed to cultural structure of the society to some extent that collective cultures often support a little authority.

Perpections on the Attitudes and Behaviours of Teacher Leaders
In this part of the study, the findings related to perceptions of participants on the attitudes and behaviours of teacher leaders will be presented under different titles."Teacher who is able to find solutions rather than being the part of the problem, is able to develop empathy, pays attention to national and intangible assets and is able to transmit them to the students, informs people and deserves praise is called as a teacher leader".(P26)

Affect environment 12
Become role model 12

Listen to others 8
Keep up with new developments 8

Treat everybody equally 7
Love what he / she does 7

Take risk 5
Behave kind but firm 3

Search for 3
Take prevention 3

Persuade others 3
Love his / her country 2 Total 138 As shown in Table 6, school administrators mostly regard teacher leaders' attitudes and behaviours as give confidence (n = 17), affect environment (n = 12), become role models (n = 12), behave consistently (n = 9), develop himself / herself (n = 9), listen to others (n = 8) and keep up with new developments (n = 8) .In addition, such codes as treat everybody equally (n = 7), love what he / she does (n = 7), realize objectives (n = 7), behave ethically (n = 6), eliminate barriers (n = 6) and take responsibility (n = 6) were formed according to the perceptions of school administrators.Other codes formed can be listed as: collaborate (n = 5), take risk (n = 5), behave kind but firm (n = 3), search for (n = 3), take prevention (n = 3), persuade others (n = 3) ve love his / her country (n = 2).When the codes displayed in Table 6 are evaluated, it can be argued that school administrators attach importance to high level of organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behaviours in terms of teacher leadership.At this point, it can be suggested that teacher leaders are expected to be role models to other colleagues with their commitments and citizenship behaviours.

Teachers' perceptions on the attitudes and behaviours of teacher leaders
Table 7. Teacher leader's attitudes and behaviours in the perpections of teachers

Codes n
Examples of Participants' Own Thoughts Develop himself / herself 14 "Teacher leaders are the ones who follow the latest developments related to their occupations.They come to classroom on time and are determinant people who are in pursuit of innovation.They keep up with the developments of technological era in which we experience.They try to improve their knowledge and skills and keep their promises.They are diligent individuals who attach importance to being fair.They know their rights."(P1) "Teacher leaders are teachers who show the full traits of an ideal teacher and make others feel the prestige of being a teacher and protect the notability of being a teacher.They are the ones who are comfortable with themselves and have positive feelings towards children.They are pleased to teach others."(P9) "Teacher leaders are those who are fond of collaboration with others for school improvement and student achievement."(P11) "A teacher leader is the teacher who knows himself / herself very well.That is, they are aware of their strenghts and weaknesses.In this perspective, they always monitor their developments and can regulate their professional skills accordingly.They are tolerant towards objections and trust themselves."(P12) "Teachers who give importance to the youth and know that the youngs are the future of the country are teacher leaders.They also contribute the developments of individuals in a mutli-dimensional way in terms of both personality and professionally.They are aware of their responsibilities in order to lift the country to higher levels in the world arena".(P13)  7, teachers mostly regard teacher leaders' attitudes and behaviours as develop himself / herself (n = 14), behave fairly (n = 11), develop empathy (n = 11), behave patiently (n = 11), open for development (n = 10), think positive (n = 10) .In addition, such codes as give confidence (n = 9), follow developments (n = 9), become entrepreneur (n = 8), collaborate (n = 8), become role model (n = 7), motivate others (n = 7) and behave socially (n = 7) were formed according to the perceptions of teachers.Other codes formed can be listed as: build authority (n = 6), search for (n = 6), keep his / her promises (n = 5), love what he / she does (n = 5), realize objectives (n = 5), know himself / herself (n = 4), never give up (n = 4), care diverstiy (n = 4), know his / her rights (n = 3), take risks (n = 3), foresee the future (n = 3), become sharer (n = 3), love his / her country (n = 2), design curriculum (n = 2) and come to classroom on time (n = 2).When the codes displayed in Table 7 are evaluated, it can be argued that teachers attach importance to being fair and develop his / her skills most.Given these codes are considered, teachers well know that both professional skills and personal traits are crucial in teacher leadership.Being fair is given importance in Turkish culture, especially for our teachers.Treat everybody equally 23

Behave consistently 12
Make the lessons enjoyable 10 Listen to others 8

Influence others 8
Behave friendly 8 Don't compare students 7

Don't do an injustice 6
Build authority 5

Form vision 4
Know his / her rights students 2 Total 125 As shown in Table 8, students mostly regard teacher leaders' attitudes and behaviours as behave fairly (n = 24), treat everybody equally (n = 23), behave consistently (n = 12) and make the lessons enjoyable (n = 10).In addition, such codes as listen to others (n = 8), influence others (n = 8), behave friendly (n = 8), don't compare students (n = 7), don't do an injustice (n = 6), build authority (n = 5), don't humiliate students (n = 5), behave understandably (n = 4), form vision (n = 4) and know his / her students (n = 2) were formed according to the perceptions of students.When the codes displayed in Table 8 are evaluated, it can be argued that students give importance for being fair and ethical issues in terms of teacher leadership.These findings reflect the importance of cultural traits of Turkish society.In other words, Turkish students seek for teachers who are dependable along with professional skills.At this point, it can be suggested that it is not sufficient for a teacher to teach well to be regarded as a teacher leader.Instead, they must have ethical values and display suitables behaviors confirmed by society.9, teachers mostly regard teacher leaders' attitudes and behaviours as influence students (n = 15), love students (n = 11), behave consistently (n = 10), treat everybody equally (n = 10) and build transformation (n = 9).In addition, such codes as become role model (n = 8), build authority (n = 6), behave fairly (n = 6), draw route (n = 4), find solutions (n = 3) and behave patiently (n = 2) were formed according to the perceptions of parents.When the codes displayed in Table 9 are evaluated, it can be argued that being influential on students and loving them are the most important attitudes and behaviours shown by teacher leaders according to the perceptions of parents.Parents consider those who display affection to their students as teacher leaders.At this point, it can be noted that teaching occupation is not just a professional occupation in Turkey, but a respected one by the all stakeholders in society.

Results, Discussion and Recommendations
This study has evaluated the perceptions of school administrators, teachers, students and parents on teacher leaders' characteristics, attitudes and behaviours.Following the thematic analysis of the data from the qualitative interviews with participants on teacher leadership, we identified some key concepts that capture the participants when reframing teacher leaders.Findings highlighted that participants' perceptions are in the same line with minor differences.That is, school principals and teachers attribute some traits to teacher leaders, such as being knowledgeable and leader, whereas students give more importance to being reliable, fair and egalitarian.On the other hand, parents embrace teachers who are friendly and impressive as teacher leaders.In this present study, teacher leaders are considered as leaders.In a study conducted by Kaya (2016), teacher leaders are referred as -lighthouse‖ due to the fact that teacher leaders help others to find their ways.Brosky (2011) found that teacher leaders are regarded as influencers and give confidence to others.Cekuc (2008) also obtained the findings such attributes as honest, hardworking, smiling, helpful, sharer, fair and egalitarian.The findings indicated that school administrators regard teacher leaders as connective, open for development, persuader, principled, decisive, polite, free, self-reliant, devoted, respected, loveable and practitioner, while teachers attribute some different traits such as active, democratic, supervisor, organized and risk taker.When these findings are compared, it can be argued that teachers also refer the traits related to teaching as well as other general characteristics of teacher leaders.Students, on the other hand, refer these traits, including enjoyable, listener, tolerant and interested, whereas parents also see teacher leaders are individuals who are ethical, transformative, empathetic, foreseeable, self-sacrificing, balanced, patient and sympathetic.In line with this, Lumpkin, Claxton ve Wilson (2014) highlight that schools need teacher leaders in order for an effective collaboration to achieve school improvement and student achievement.The work of Ado (2016) tells us that teacher leaders contribute to collaborative culture in teaching environments, while the article by Cherkowski ve Schnellert (2017) shows that teacher leaders act in collaboration with colleagues for organizational change and improvement in collective trust.As indicated by Cosenza (2015), teacher leaders are willing to cooperate with colleagues for student learning by sharing knowledge, supporting in difficult times, becoming role model, acting without hesitation and defining mutual objectives.
The second theme of this study focused on the attitudes and behaviours displayed by teacher leaders.School administrators consider that teacher leaders behave ethically, eliminate barriers, persuade, take responsibility, take measures and behave kind but firm, while teachers perceive that teacher leaders come to classroom on time, predict the future, know themselves, design curriculums, never give up, think positively, behave socially and follow the latest trends in teaching.As mentioned above, it can be argued that teachers focus on the attitudes and behaviours as regards the teaching itself along with personal characteristics more than school administrators.This difference may stem from that teachers can be referred as typically those making war in the battle front, so it wouldn't be surprising that they mostly concentrate on attitudes and behaviours related to teaching tasks in the classroom.Students, on the other hand, attribute these attitudes and behaviours, including being considerate, behaving friendly, making the lessons enjoyable, not doing injustice, not comparing students, knowing students, not humiliating students and making students have vision, whereas parents consider that teacher leaders are those finding solutions to the problems, provide transformation, affect students, love students and guide them.In a study conducted by Khan and Malik (2013), they found that teacher leaders are really effective in increasing student achievement and transforming the school and its environment.As Lambert (2003) reminds us, teacher leaders insert their colleagues in a proffesional school culture.The article by Lowery-Moore, Latimer and Villate (2016) shows that teacher leaders prefer leading in the classroom and becoming -change agents‖ as experienced teachers rather than taking responsibility in managerial issues outside the classroom.The works of Cherkowski and Schnellert (2017) and Fairman and Mackenzie (2014) tell us that teacher leaders adopt an attitude focusing on innovation and improvement.With a similar finding, Bryant (2017) puts forward that teacher leaders act from the heart.It was also stated by Lowery-Moore, Latimer and Villate (2016) that teacher leaders attach importance to diversity in the classroom and school and contribute student achievement and school improvement, taking into consideration multiculturalism.Clayton, Kilbane ve McCarthy (2017) argues that teacher leaders trust students on learning and believe that students give efforts to learn till the end.Can (2010) suggests that instructional time is used effectively by teacher leaders.
This study offers some theoretical contributions.First of all, the findings shed light on cultural perceptions related to teacher leadership.The findings show that teaching has also some cultural aspects and teachers are evaluated within this perspective.In addition, the study highlights that teacher leaders are those creating awareness and differences in their school organizations and add a lot to school culture and climate positively.Secondly, each administrator in educational settings can be suggested that they must reveal leadership skills of teachers and include them in improving schools as well as increasing student achievement.The findings of this study has also several practical implications.The results of this article offers a detailed framework attitudes and behaviours related to teacher leadership.The findings may guide teacher trainers in universities and they may give effort to reveal and improve leadership skills of prospective teachers.The present work may be particularly important since it provides some results shedding light on cultural issues with regard to teacher leadership.That is, Turkish school administrators, teachers, students and parents attach more importance to become sincere, dependable, fair, egalitarian and tolerant.As Pehlivan (2017) reminds us, Turkish society has certain merits, such as good-bad, reward-sin in accordance with its social structure, national values and religious beliefs.Within this context, the participants may have focused on personal characteristisc as well as professional knowledge and skills of teacher leaders from these perspectives.That is, it can argued that it is not just enough to teach well an develop professional skills to be considered as a teacher leaders, but is necessary to have valued personal traits appreciated in society.
We outline some recommendations for practitioners, policy makers and researchers in this section of the study.For practitioners, teachers' leadership skills must be revealed and developed.Schools must be supported in line with this purpose.That is, schools must be organized such a way that teachers are able to feel that they are important part of team and must take responsibility both in and out of the classroom, not just in teaching but other issues, as well.For policy makers, it can be suggested that school organizations must be redesigned in terms of both structure and culture so that all stakeholders can contribute to school improvement and student achievement.When it comes to researchers, a new research path would be to evaluate how teacher leaders pursue their characteristics, attitudes and behaviours.Studies on teacher leaders' motivations would also be useful to go more deeply into the notion of teacher leadership.Finally, we regard it a limitation of this research that we have paid little attention to factors such as socio-economic level, school cultures and achievements of the participants.These can also be explored in greater detail to understand teacher leadership in detail.In conclusion, this study is believed to make a valuable contribution to the existing literature of leadership in terms of dealing the issue in a cultural perspective.

Table 1 .
Demographic distributions of participants

Table 2 .
Teacher leader in the perpections of school administrators

Table 3 .
Teacher leader in the perpections of teachers "A teacher leader is the teacher who shares his / her knowledge and is able to realize lots of tasks simultaneously.What is more, being organized, confidential and guide both in the classroom and in the school are the core characteristics".(P16)

Table 4 .
Teacher leader in the perpections of students "Teachers who have an influence on us are our leaders.First of all, our teacher leader doesn't make comparisons among students and don't discriminate.Rather, treat everybody equally.Then, those are considered as leaders by students".(P4) "A teacher who always talks to us logically is my teacher leader.He / she often exemplifies what he / she teaches, never mentions the things he / she doesn't know.Listen to the students until the end.If the students are wrong, he / she justifies his / her ideas.Teacher leader is a person that students never fear from asking questions." (P5) "A teacher leader is the teacher who behave friendly and talks to the students accordingly.He / she not only teaches about the courses, but also gives advises to the students about the real life.He / she is the teacher with whom we can communicate outside the classroom."(P15) "I see teachers who are sincere as my leader.I must be sure about his / her actions and must behave like our mother or father when necessary.I must be able to trust my teacher leader.I must believe that his / her ideas, thought and feelings are real and true.I must be able to ask for help whenever I need.He / she must reflect the person whom I want to be in the future.He / she must be happy and must make us happy.I cannot consider a teacher whom I cannot trust."(P24)

Table 5 .
Teacher leader in the perpections of parents

Table 6 .
Teacher leader's attitudes and behaviours in the perpections of school administrators "A teacher leader is the one loved by others, respected and listened in the environment.He / she is the teacher who harmonises with their environments or make the environments correspond with him / her." (P17) "Teacher leaders take responsibility in and out of the classroom for the school improvement and student achievement.Display a strong psychological structure and they are decisive, self-confident, open-minded team work, able to make a fair decision-making attitude and good role models."(P24) "A teacher leader is not the individual causing the problems, rather he / she is the solution itself.They are the ones who can make emphatize with others, have high level of national values and can transmit these values to the students".(P24)

Table 8 .
Teacher leader's attitudes and behaviours in the perpections of students

Table 9 .
Teacher leader's attitudes and behaviours in the perpections of parents