An Experimental Study of Complex-Offer Auctions from Wholesale Energy Markets

Rimvydas Baltaduonis

Abstract


A Payment Cost Minimization auction has been proposed as an alternative to the Offer Cost Minimization auction for use in wholesale electric power markets with an intention to lower procurement cost of electricity. Efficiency concerns have been raised for this proposal while assuming that the true production costs would be revealed to the auctioneer in a competitive market. Using an experimental approach, the study compares the performance of these two complex-offer auctions, controlling for the level of unilateral market power. The analysis finds that neither auction results in allocations that correspond to the true cost revelation. Two auctions perform similarly in terms of procurement cost and efficiency. Surprisingly, consumer prices in a competitive environment approach the prices of an environment with market power. It appears that the expected institutional effects for procurement cost and efficiency are greatly dominated by the effects of anti-competitive behavior due to the offer complexity and a cyclical nature of market demand.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alonso J., Trias, A., Gaitan, V., Alba, J. (1999). Thermal Plant Bids and Market Clearing in an Electricity Pool. Minimization of Costs vs. Minimization of Consumer Payments. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 14(4), 1327-1334.

Arroyo, J., Conejo, A. (2002). Miltiperiod Auction for a Pool-Based Electricity Market. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 17(4), 1225-1231.

Baltaduonis, R. (2007). Efficiency in Deregulated Electricity Markets: Offer Cost Minimization vs. Payment Cost Minimization Auction. Mechanisms & Policies in Economics. Athens: ATINER, 173-188.

Davis, D., Holt, C. (1994). Market Power and Mergers in Laboratory Markets with Posted Prices. RAND Journal of Economics, 25(3), 467-487.

Durham, Y., McCabe, K., Olson, M., Rassenti, S., Smith, V. (2004). Oligopoly Competition in Fixed Cost Environments. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22, 147-162.

Durham, Y., Rassenti, S., Smith, V., Van Boening, M., Wilcox, N. (1996). Can Core Allocations Be Achieved in Avoidable Fixed Cost Environments Using Two-part Price Competition? Annals of Operations Research, 68, 61-88.

Holt, C. (1989). The Exercise of Market Power in Laboratory Experiments. Journal of Law and Economics, 32, S107-S130.

Knoblauch, V. (2005). Can a Newly Proposed Mechanism for Allocating Contracts in U.S. Electricity Wholesale Markets Lead to Lower Prices? A Game Theoretic Analysis. Working Papers 2004-41R, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.

Luh, P., Blankson, W., Chen, Y., Yan, J., Stern, G., Chang, S., Zhao, F. (2005). Payment Cost Minimization Auction for Deregulated Electricity Markets Using Surrogate Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

O’Neill, R., Sotkiewicz, P., Hobbs, B., Rothkopf, M., Stewart Jr., W. (2004). Efficient Market-clearing Prices in Markets with Nonconvexities. European Journal of Operational Research, 164(1), 269-285.

Padhy, N. (2004). Unit Commitment – A Bibliographical Survey. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 19(3), 1196-1205.

Rassenti, S., Smith, V., Wilson, B. (2003a). Controlling Market Power and Price Spikes in Electricity Networks: Demand Side-Bidding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(5), 2998-3003.

Rassenti, S., Smith, V., Wilson, B. (2003b). Discriminatory Price Auctions in Electricity Markets: Low Volatility at the Expense of High Price Levels. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 23(2), 109-123.

Yan, J., Stern, G. (2002). Simultaneous Optimal Auction and Unit Commitment for Deregulated Electricity Markets. The Electricity Journal, 72-80.

Zhao, F., Luh, P.; Yan, J.; Stern, G.; Chang, S. (2010). Bid Cost Minimization versus Payment Cost Minimization: A Game Theoretic Study of Electricity Auctions. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 25(1), 181-194.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.11114/aef.v1i1.385

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Paper Submission E-mail: aef@redfame.com

Applied Economics and Finance    ISSN 2332-7294 (Print)   ISSN 2332-7308 (Online)

Copyright © Redfame Publishing Inc.

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'redfame.com' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------